Talqivo vs Microsoft Teams: how the work fits
Teams brings conversations, meetings and Microsoft 365 collaboration into one familiar entry point. Project tasks are handled through Planner, while shared files remain connected to SharePoint and OneDrive, making the surrounding Microsoft environment part of the decision.
Compare the features, side by side.
A shared view of 62 capabilities across Talqivo and Microsoft Teams.
Native describes a built-in capability, not inclusion in every plan. Limits and access can depend on plan, edition, add-ons or setup.
- Native
- Conditional
- Integration
- Partial
- Not native
- Unconfirmed
We have not verified this capability in the linked official documentation; this does not mean it is unavailable.
62 features · 9 categories
Sources for this feature grid
- Microsoft: Planner in Teams and personal tasks
- Microsoft: Planner capabilities and licensing
- Microsoft: Compare Teams plans
- Microsoft: Meetings and calendar in Teams
- Microsoft: Teams uses SharePoint and OneDrive for file storage
- Microsoft: Record video, screen and audio clips in Teams
- Microsoft: Create a poll with Forms in Teams
- Microsoft: Whiteboard in Teams
- Microsoft: Workflows, connected apps and run history
- Microsoft: Shifts time clock and timesheets
- Microsoft: Teams Activity feed
- Microsoft: Apps and services in Teams
- Microsoft Graph: Teams and channel change notifications
- Microsoft Graph: Import external messages into Teams
- Microsoft: Export Teams content
- Microsoft: Guest experience in Teams
- Microsoft: Teams security and compliance
- Microsoft: Search Teams audit events
- Microsoft: Teams message retention policies
- Microsoft: Teams language and regional settings
- Microsoft: Teams desktop and mobile downloads
- Microsoft: Search messages, people and files in Teams
- Microsoft: Recurring tasks in Planner
Where Talqivo fits
Talqivo fits teams that want project tasks, documents, time and reporting in one workspace, with conversations connected directly to the work being delivered.
When Microsoft Teams may fit better
Teams may fit better when native meetings and established Microsoft 365 communication are central, particularly for organisations already relying on SharePoint, OneDrive and Planner.
Compare the work, step by step.
Scroll sideways to read both sides of the comparison.
| What matters | Talqivo | Microsoft Teams |
|---|---|---|
| Conversations and meetings | Chat channels, direct messages and Clips sit beside projects. Calls open a configured external URL; Zoom has a separate connector. See how it works in Talqivo | Teams provides channels, direct messages and native online meetings, with calendars connected to Teams, Exchange and Outlook. |
| Project task planning | Tasks include subtasks, statuses, dependencies and recurring work, connected to project views and sprints within the workspace's available plan. See how it works in Talqivo | Task planning comes through Planner; advanced timelines, dependencies, sprints and workload depend on the applicable premium plan and configuration. |
| Files and project context | Docs, task attachments and file review keep project context together, with optional cloud-storage links and access controlled within the workspace. See how it works in Talqivo | Channel files are stored in SharePoint; chat files use OneDrive for Business, with access and collaboration tied to Microsoft 365. |
Plan the move before moving everything.
Start with one representative project. Check owners, dates, statuses, custom fields, attachments and access permissions, then agree what to migrate and what to keep as a reference.
Talqivo's Teams connections and tabs are integrations, not a chat or SharePoint migration. Export suitable Planner task data to Excel, map supported columns and review permissions, conversations and links separately before moving a project.
Explore imports and migrationMake space for the work that matters.
Bring your next project into Talqivo. Start with a task, invite your team and build from there.
Get started freeProduct names belong to their respective owners. These independent comparisons do not imply affiliation or endorsement.